There is no document that says what a contractor must have to work on your site, so every project manager applies a different bar and the weakest one sets your exposure.
Insurance certificates and safety manuals land in an inbox and get filed. Nobody checks limits, expiration dates, additional insured status or whether the safety program covers the work being performed.
Contractors sign in, receive no site-specific hazard information, and go to work next to hazards they were never told about. The sign-in sheet is the only record, and it proves attendance rather than competence.
A landscaping crew and a crew doing hot work in a confined space face the same one-size qualification. Either you over-burden low-risk work or under-qualify the work that can kill someone.
Qualification happens at onboarding and then nothing. Crews change, foremen change, scope changes, and the qualification record describes a company that showed up eighteen months ago.
When an incident happens, the question is what you knew and what you enforced. Without a dated record of qualification, orientation and corrective action, you are arguing from memory.
We write the standard, build the tiering logic, create the intake and review workflow, produce the orientation content, and define the monitoring cadence and escalation path. Then we either hand it over or run it for you.
Everything is reviewed and signed by a Certified Safety Professional. Contractor injury and training data stays in a private, secured environment.
Raising a qualification standard usually disqualifies contractors you actually want to keep using. We work both sides of that: you set the bar, and we can take the subcontractor through prequalification remediation so they clear it instead of you losing a trade partner you rely on.
Prequalification platforms verify documents. They do not tell you whether a subcontractor can actually execute safely on your site, they do not manage orientation or site access, and they do not give you a defensible record of your own oversight if OSHA arrives under the multi-employer citation policy. The platform is the screen. This is the program behind it.
It depends on your role and your control of the hazard, and OSHA can cite a controlling employer for a subcontractor exposure. What protects you is a documented program showing how you selected, qualified, oriented and monitored that contractor — and evidence you enforced it. That documentation is what we build.
Yes, and that is the normal case. The work is a tiered qualification standard, a document intake and review process, a site orientation, and a monitoring cadence. Production runs AI-assisted and offshore; a CSP sets the standard and signs the program.
Yes. Many clients keep us on a monthly retainer that owns intake, review, expiration tracking and escalation, and reports to you on which contractors are cleared, conditional or blocked.
Yes. The structure is the same; the leverage point differs. Owners set the standard and push it down through the GC. General contractors build the standard, qualify the subs and carry the site-level enforcement.
Twenty minutes to walk through how you qualify contractors today and where the exposure actually sits.