Electrical safety, stored energy, work at height, and increasingly — lithium-ion systems whose failure mode is a hazardous-materials event, not an equipment fault. Energy work is low-frequency, high-consequence, and it punishes paper programs.
Whether you’re building renewables, operating generation assets, or deploying battery storage, the exposures share a shape: enormous stored energy, crews distributed across sites you don’t visit weekly, and contractor interfaces where responsibility loves to blur. The recordable rate tells you almost nothing here — the incidents that matter are the ones your controls either prevent or don’t.
Lockout, switching, grounding, stored mechanical and chemical energy — verified in the field, not certified in a binder.
Thermal runaway is a process safety problem wearing an electrical costume: detection, deflagration venting, emergency response pre-planning with the local fire authority, and commissioning discipline.
Distributed work needs a system that travels: pre-task planning that’s actually used, stop-work authority that’s actually honored, and verification that doesn’t depend on your presence.
Carriers are repricing energy risk aggressively — especially anything touching battery storage. A credible, documented process safety approach to your BESS deployments is becoming the difference between placeable and problem risk. Your broker will tell you the same thing; I make the underwriting story true.
Energy operations carry oil in quantity — transformers, generators, hydraulic systems — which is SPCC territory from surprisingly small footprints, plus stormwater exposure at yards and laydown areas and waste streams from maintenance. The environmental file gets the same treatment as the electrical one: inventoried, planned, and owned on a calendar.
Both. The hazard physics are the same; what changes is who else is in the room — utility interconnection requirements, AHJ fire review, and landlord or host-site obligations. The safety case has to satisfy all of them.
Yes — contractor interface is usually where energy programs fail. I build the flow-downs, the qualification standards, and the field verification so “their problem” never becomes your incident.
Energy work needs both lenses. Compliance sets the floor; the consequence profile — arc flash, thermal runaway, work at height over energized equipment — demands process-safety thinking even where regulation doesn’t explicitly require it.
Bring your single-line diagram or your site list. The first conversation is about your consequence profile, not a services menu.